Aflac

AFL · Financials

Sustainability score

51.7Rank 251 overall / 56 in Financials

Aflac's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Controversy level.

50th percentile of the index, 27th percentile of Financials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

10%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

48%

Net margin

FCF margin

31%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

AFL · Aflac

Middle · middle 60% of Financials · score 49.4 · rank 34/76

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: n/a debt load; FCF margin 14% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: HOLDNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA n/a; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and FCF margin.

Aflac

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

AFL · Aflac

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Aflac

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

AFL · Aflac

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation