Akamai Technologies

AKAM · Information Technology

Sustainability score

48.1Rank 330 overall / 71 in Information Technology

Akamai Technologies's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Controversy level.

34th percentile of the index, 3th percentile of Information Technology

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

Controversy level

Asset turnover

39%

Net margin

FCF margin

23%

Net debt / EBITDA

16%

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

AKAM · Akamai Technologies

Laggard · bottom 20% of Information Technology · score 65.5 · rank 65/73

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 4.8x debt load; FCF margin 15% · sector median 0.8x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 4.8x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: FCF margin and leverage vs sector target.

Information Technology peers

Key takeaways

AKAM's cleanup cost is 0.00 yrs, at the Information Technology median of 0.00 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…