Ares Management

ARES · Financials

Sustainability score

41.5Rank 428 overall / 76 in Financials

Ares Management's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by FCF margin and Asset turnover. It sits closest to the frontier on Emissions intensity.

15th percentile of the index, 0th percentile of Financials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

10%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

29%

Net margin

FCF margin

39%

Net debt / EBITDA

13%

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

ARES · Ares Management

Laggard · bottom 20% of Financials · score 28.6 · rank 73/76

Cleanup cost: 0.10 yrs · $218.3M; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 5.3x debt load; FCF margin 14% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	$180.2k
On-site fuel combustion	$218.1M
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	$0
Fugitive emissions	$0

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.10 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 5.3x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and leverage vs sector target.

Ares Management

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

ARES · Ares Management

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Ares Management

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

ARES · Ares Management

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation