Ball Corporation

BALL · Materials

Sustainability score

41.9Rank 424 overall / 9 in Materials

Ball Corporation's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Emissions intensity and Asset turnover. It sits closest to the frontier on Controversy level.

16th percentile of the index, 67th percentile of Materials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

42%

ESG risk score

Controversy level

Asset turnover

20%

Net margin

FCF margin

18%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

BALL · Ball Corporation

Middle · middle 60% of Materials · score 41.9 · rank 15/25

Cleanup cost: 0.12 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.12 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 3.2x debt load; FCF margin 6% · sector median 2.0x

Verdict: HOLDNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.12 years of earnings (sector median 0.12 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 3.2x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and FCF margin.

Ball Corporation

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

BALL · Ball Corporation

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Materials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Ball Corporation

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

BALL · Ball Corporation

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Materials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation