Franklin Resources

BEN · Financials

Sustainability score

49.5Rank 301 overall / 64 in Financials

Franklin Resources's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and Net debt / EBITDA. It sits closest to the frontier on Emissions intensity.

40th percentile of the index, 16th percentile of Financials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

Controversy level

Asset turnover

40%

Net margin

FCF margin

12%

Net debt / EBITDA

24%

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

BEN · Franklin Resources

Laggard · bottom 20% of Financials · score 23.9 · rank 75/76

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 6.1x debt load; FCF margin 2% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 6.1x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and leverage vs sector target.

Franklin Resources

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

BEN · Franklin Resources

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Franklin Resources

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

BEN · Franklin Resources

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation