Baker Hughes

BKR · Energy

Sustainability score

40.0Rank 441 overall / 16 in Energy

Baker Hughes's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Emissions intensity and ESG risk score. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

12th percentile of the index, 25th percentile of Energy

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

27%

ESG risk score

27%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

24%

Net margin

FCF margin

13%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

BKR · Baker Hughes

Middle · middle 60% of Energy · score 24.5 · rank 15/21

Cleanup cost: 0.04 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.04 yrs
Revenue at risk: 100%; Sector median 100%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 0.1x debt load; FCF margin 11% · sector median 0.8x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.04 years of earnings (sector median 0.04 years), fossil revenue 100%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 0.1x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: fossil revenue share and beneficiary revenue share.

Baker Hughes

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

BKR · Baker Hughes

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Energy peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Baker Hughes

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

BKR · Baker Hughes

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Energy peers

Key takeaways

Explanation