Carrier Global

CARR · Industrials

Sustainability score

46.6Rank 352 overall / 63 in Industrials

Carrier Global's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

30th percentile of the index, 24th percentile of Industrials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

14%

ESG risk score

19%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

29%

Net margin

FCF margin

21%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

CARR · Carrier Global

Leader · top 20% of Industrials · score 70.0 · rank 11/83

Cleanup cost: 0.01 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.01 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 100%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 3.4x debt load; FCF margin 9% · sector median 1.6x

Verdict: BUYNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.01 years of earnings (sector median 0.01 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 100%, net debt/EBITDA 3.4x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: FCF margin and leverage vs sector target.

Carrier Global

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

CARR · Carrier Global

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Industrials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Carrier Global

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

CARR · Carrier Global

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Industrials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation