Cboe Global Markets

CBOE · Financials

Sustainability score

50.9Rank 271 overall / 58 in Financials

Cboe Global Markets's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by FCF margin and Asset turnover. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

46th percentile of the index, 24th percentile of Financials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

12%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

29%

Net margin

FCF margin

53%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

CBOE · Cboe Global Markets

Laggard · bottom 20% of Financials · score 41.3 · rank 65/76

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 0.1x debt load; FCF margin 37% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 0.1x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and FCF margin.

Cboe Global Markets

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

CBOE · Cboe Global Markets

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Cboe Global Markets

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

CBOE · Cboe Global Markets

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation