C.H. Robinson

CHRW · Industrials

Sustainability score

58.6Rank 75 overall / 5 in Industrials

C.H. Robinson's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by FCF margin and Emissions intensity. It sits closest to the frontier on Asset turnover.

85th percentile of the index, 95th percentile of Industrials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

19%

ESG risk score

16%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

Net margin

15%

FCF margin

47%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

CHRW · C.H. Robinson

Laggard · bottom 20% of Industrials · score 29.0 · rank 77/83

Cleanup cost: 0.01 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.01 yrs
Revenue at risk: 91%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 1.3x debt load; FCF margin 5% · sector median 1.6x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.01 years of earnings (sector median 0.01 years), fossil revenue 91%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 1.3x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and fossil revenue share.

C.H. Robinson

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

CHRW · C.H. Robinson

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Industrials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

C.H. Robinson

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

CHRW · C.H. Robinson

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Industrials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation