Charter Communications

CHTR · Communication Services

Sustainability score

42.4Rank 419 overall / 23 in Communication Services

Charter Communications's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Controversy level.

17th percentile of the index, 4th percentile of Communication Services

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

15%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

33%

Net margin

FCF margin

22%

Net debt / EBITDA

10%

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

CHTR · Charter Communications

Laggard · bottom 20% of Communication Services · score 17.7 · rank 22/24

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 4.5x debt load; FCF margin 8% · sector median 0.8x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 4.5x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: leverage vs sector target and FCF margin.

Communication Services peers

Key takeaways

CHTR's cleanup cost is 0.00 yrs, at the Communication Services median of 0.00 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…