CRH plc

CRH · Materials

Sustainability score

38.5Rank 451 overall / 15 in Materials

CRH plc's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Emissions intensity and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

10th percentile of the index, 42th percentile of Materials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

36%

ESG risk score

16%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

19%

Net margin

FCF margin

20%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

CRH · CRH plc

Middle · middle 60% of Materials · score 42.5 · rank 14/25

Cleanup cost: 0.12 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.12 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 1.8x debt load; FCF margin 7% · sector median 2.0x

Verdict: HOLDNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.12 years of earnings (sector median 0.12 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 1.8x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and FCF margin.

CRH plc

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

CRH · CRH plc

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Materials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

CRH plc

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

CRH · CRH plc

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Materials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation