Charles River Laboratories

CRL · Health Care

Sustainability score

44.2Rank 396 overall / 50 in Health Care

Charles River Laboratories's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Controversy level.

21th percentile of the index, 16th percentile of Health Care

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

10%

ESG risk score

16%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

31%

Net margin

12%

FCF margin

18%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

CRL · Charles River Laboratories

Laggard · bottom 20% of Health Care · score 40.3 · rank 57/59

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 11.0x debt load; FCF margin 9% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 11.0x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: leverage vs sector target and transition burden.

Charles River Laboratories

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

CRL · Charles River Laboratories

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Health Care peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Charles River Laboratories

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

CRL · Charles River Laboratories

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Health Care peers

Key takeaways

Explanation