EchoStar

ECHO · Communication Services

Sustainability score

49.3Rank 306 overall / 11 in Communication Services

EchoStar's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Net margin.

39th percentile of the index, 57th percentile of Communication Services

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

10%

ESG risk score

17%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

35%

Net margin

FCF margin

33%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

ECHO · EchoStar

Laggard · bottom 20% of Communication Services · score 12.8 · rank 24/24

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: n/a debt load; FCF margin -6% · sector median 0.8x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA negative EBITDA; largest gaps to the sector ideal: FCF margin and leverage vs sector target.

Communication Services peers

Key takeaways

ECHO's cleanup cost is 0.00 yrs, at the Communication Services median of 0.00 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…