Everest Group

EG · Financials

Sustainability score

52.8Rank 223 overall / 53 in Financials

Everest Group's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Controversy level.

56th percentile of the index, 31th percentile of Financials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

11%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

47%

Net margin

FCF margin

28%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

EG · Everest Group

Middle · middle 60% of Financials · score 49.2 · rank 40/76

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: n/a debt load; FCF margin 12% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: HOLDNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA n/a; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and FCF margin.

Everest Group

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

EG · Everest Group

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Everest Group

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

EG · Everest Group

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation