Edwards Lifesciences

EW · Health Care

Sustainability score

56.0Rank 128 overall / 12 in Health Care

Edwards Lifesciences's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and Emissions intensity. It sits closest to the frontier on Controversy level.

75th percentile of the index, 81th percentile of Health Care

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

16%

ESG risk score

14%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

48%

Net margin

FCF margin

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

EW · Edwards Lifesciences

Middle · middle 60% of Health Care · score 61.3 · rank 47/59

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: -1.3x debt load; FCF margin 22% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA -1.3x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and leverage vs sector target.

Edwards Lifesciences

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

EW · Edwards Lifesciences

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Health Care peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Edwards Lifesciences

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

EW · Edwards Lifesciences

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Health Care peers

Key takeaways

Explanation