Fidelity National Information Services

FIS · Financials

Sustainability score

50.3Rank 284 overall / 61 in Financials

Fidelity National Information Services's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Controversy level.

44th percentile of the index, 20th percentile of Financials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

Controversy level

Asset turnover

41%

Net margin

FCF margin

26%

Net debt / EBITDA

12%

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

FIS · Fidelity National Information Services

Laggard · bottom 20% of Financials · score 33.8 · rank 69/76

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 4.9x debt load; FCF margin 16% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 4.9x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and leverage vs sector target.

Fidelity National Information Services

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

FIS · Fidelity National Information Services

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Fidelity National Information Services

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

FIS · Fidelity National Information Services

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation