Fortive

FTV · Industrials

Sustainability score

47.0Rank 343 overall / 59 in Industrials

Fortive's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and ESG risk score. It sits closest to the frontier on Controversy level.

32th percentile of the index, 29th percentile of Industrials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

12%

ESG risk score

33%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

35%

Net margin

FCF margin

10%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

FTV · Fortive

Middle · middle 60% of Industrials · score 50.2 · rank 23/83

Cleanup cost: 0.01 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.01 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 2.5x debt load; FCF margin 24% · sector median 1.6x

Verdict: BUYNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.01 years of earnings (sector median 0.01 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 2.5x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and FCF margin.

Fortive

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

FTV · Fortive

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Industrials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Fortive

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

FTV · Fortive

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Industrials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation