Garmin

GRMN · Consumer Discretionary

Sustainability score

54.5Rank 170 overall / 24 in Consumer Discretionary

Garmin's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

66th percentile of the index, 50th percentile of Consumer Discretionary

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

12%

ESG risk score

17%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

37%

Net margin

FCF margin

27%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

GRMN · Garmin

Middle · middle 60% of Consumer Discretionary · score 49.1 · rank 15/47

Cleanup cost: 0.01 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.01 yrs
Revenue at risk: 14%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: -0.9x debt load; FCF margin 21% · sector median 1.6x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.01 years of earnings (sector median 0.01 years), fossil revenue 14%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA -0.9x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and FCF margin.

Consumer Discretionary peers

Key takeaways

GRMN's cleanup cost is 0.01 yrs, at the Consumer Discretionary median of 0.01 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 14% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…