W. W. Grainger

GWW · Industrials

Sustainability score

59.5Rank 60 overall / 2 in Industrials

W. W. Grainger's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by FCF margin and Emissions intensity. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

88th percentile of the index, 99th percentile of Industrials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

22%

ESG risk score

12%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

Net margin

12%

FCF margin

44%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

GWW · W. W. Grainger

Middle · middle 60% of Industrials · score 45.0 · rank 57/83

Cleanup cost: 0.01 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.01 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 0.6x debt load; FCF margin 8% · sector median 1.6x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.01 years of earnings (sector median 0.01 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 0.6x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and FCF margin.

W. W. Grainger

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

GWW · W. W. Grainger

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Industrials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

W. W. Grainger

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

GWW · W. W. Grainger

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Industrials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation