Hilton Worldwide

HLT · Consumer Discretionary

Sustainability score

43.3Rank 407 overall / 41 in Consumer Discretionary

Hilton Worldwide's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Emissions intensity and Asset turnover. It sits closest to the frontier on Controversy level.

19th percentile of the index, 13th percentile of Consumer Discretionary

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

33%

ESG risk score

Controversy level

Asset turnover

23%

Net margin

FCF margin

19%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

HLT · Hilton Worldwide

Middle · middle 60% of Consumer Discretionary · score 45.7 · rank 36/47

Cleanup cost: 0.04 yrs · $108.5M; Sector median 0.01 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 4.0x debt load; FCF margin 16% · sector median 1.6x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	$42.1M
On-site fuel combustion	$66.5M
Vehicle fleets	$0
Process emissions	$0
Fugitive emissions	$0

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.04 years of earnings (sector median 0.01 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 4.0x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and FCF margin.

Consumer Discretionary peers

Key takeaways

HLT's cleanup cost is 0.04 yrs, above the Consumer Discretionary median of 0.01 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…