Interactive Brokers

IBKR · Financials

Sustainability score

58.3Rank 83 overall / 19 in Financials

Interactive Brokers's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and ESG risk score. It sits closest to the frontier on FCF margin.

84th percentile of the index, 76th percentile of Financials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

18%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

62%

Net margin

10%

FCF margin

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

IBKR · Interactive Brokers

Middle · middle 60% of Financials · score 47.6 · rank 50/76

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: -0.8x debt load; FCF margin 143% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: HOLDNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA -0.8x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and leverage vs sector target.

Interactive Brokers

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

IBKR · Interactive Brokers

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Interactive Brokers

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

IBKR · Interactive Brokers

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation