IBM

IBM · Information Technology

Sustainability score

52.4Rank 229 overall / 65 in Information Technology

IBM's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Controversy level.

55th percentile of the index, 11th percentile of Information Technology

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

Controversy level

Asset turnover

43%

Net margin

FCF margin

25%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

IBM · IBM

Middle · middle 60% of Information Technology · score 72.1 · rank 54/73

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 3.1x debt load; FCF margin 19% · sector median 0.8x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 3.1x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: FCF margin and leverage vs sector target.

Information Technology peers

Key takeaways

IBM's cleanup cost is 0.00 yrs, at the Information Technology median of 0.00 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…