Intercontinental Exchange

ICE · Financials

Sustainability score

59.3Rank 64 overall / 14 in Financials

Intercontinental Exchange's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and ESG risk score. It sits closest to the frontier on Controversy level.

87th percentile of the index, 83th percentile of Financials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

16%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

69%

Net margin

FCF margin

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

ICE · Intercontinental Exchange

Middle · middle 60% of Financials · score 49.4 · rank 36/76

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 2.4x debt load; FCF margin 35% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: HOLDNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 2.4x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and FCF margin.

Intercontinental Exchange

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

ICE · Intercontinental Exchange

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Intercontinental Exchange

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

ICE · Intercontinental Exchange

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation