J.B. Hunt

JBHT · Industrials

Sustainability score

58.9Rank 71 overall / 3 in Industrials

J.B. Hunt's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by FCF margin and Emissions intensity. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

86th percentile of the index, 98th percentile of Industrials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

22%

ESG risk score

10%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

Net margin

16%

FCF margin

42%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

JBHT · J.B. Hunt

Middle · middle 60% of Industrials · score 45.2 · rank 56/83

Cleanup cost: 0.01 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.01 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 0.7x debt load; FCF margin 9% · sector median 1.6x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.01 years of earnings (sector median 0.01 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 0.7x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and FCF margin.

J.B. Hunt

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

JBHT · J.B. Hunt

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Industrials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

J.B. Hunt

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

JBHT · J.B. Hunt

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Industrials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation