Jabil

JBL · Information Technology

Sustainability score

58.2Rank 86 overall / 36 in Information Technology

Jabil's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by FCF margin and Net margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

83th percentile of the index, 51th percentile of Information Technology

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

15%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

14%

Net margin

17%

FCF margin

45%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

JBL · Jabil

Laggard · bottom 20% of Information Technology · score 69.4 · rank 60/73

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 1.0x debt load; FCF margin 4% · sector median 0.8x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 1.0x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: FCF margin and transition burden.

Information Technology peers

Key takeaways

JBL's cleanup cost is 0.00 yrs, at the Information Technology median of 0.00 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…