Lam Research

LRCX · Information Technology

Sustainability score

64.6Rank 16 overall / 13 in Information Technology

Lam Research's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by FCF margin and Asset turnover. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

97th percentile of the index, 83th percentile of Information Technology

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

10%

ESG risk score

12%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

36%

Net margin

FCF margin

36%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

LRCX · Lam Research

Middle · middle 60% of Information Technology · score 75.9 · rank 39/73

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: -0.2x debt load; FCF margin 21% · sector median 0.8x

Verdict: HOLDNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA -0.2x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: FCF margin and leverage vs sector target.

Information Technology peers

Key takeaways

LRCX's cleanup cost is 0.00 yrs, at the Information Technology median of 0.00 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…