Las Vegas Sands

LVS · Consumer Discretionary

Sustainability score

49.5Rank 302 overall / 35 in Consumer Discretionary

Las Vegas Sands's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Controversy level.

40th percentile of the index, 26th percentile of Consumer Discretionary

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

10%

ESG risk score

12%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

34%

Net margin

FCF margin

25%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

LVS · Las Vegas Sands

Leader · top 20% of Consumer Discretionary · score 50.4 · rank 10/47

Cleanup cost: 0.01 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.01 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 2.6x debt load; FCF margin 20% · sector median 1.6x

Verdict: BUYNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.01 years of earnings (sector median 0.01 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 2.6x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and FCF margin.

Consumer Discretionary peers

Key takeaways

LVS's cleanup cost is 0.01 yrs, at the Consumer Discretionary median of 0.01 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…