McKesson Corporation

MCK · Health Care

Sustainability score

58.0Rank 90 overall / 8 in Health Care

McKesson Corporation's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by FCF margin and Net margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Asset turnover.

82th percentile of the index, 88th percentile of Health Care

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

15%

ESG risk score

Controversy level

13%

Asset turnover

Net margin

16%

FCF margin

46%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

MCK · McKesson Corporation

Middle · middle 60% of Health Care · score 63.4 · rank 44/59

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 0.6x debt load; FCF margin 1% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 0.6x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and FCF margin.

McKesson Corporation

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

MCK · McKesson Corporation

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Health Care peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

McKesson Corporation

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

MCK · McKesson Corporation

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Health Care peers

Key takeaways

Explanation