Meta Platforms

META · Communication Services

Sustainability score

44.3Rank 395 overall / 21 in Communication Services

Meta Platforms's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by ESG risk score and Asset turnover. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

22th percentile of the index, 13th percentile of Communication Services

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

27%

Controversy level

13%

Asset turnover

26%

Net margin

FCF margin

24%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

META · Meta Platforms

Leader · top 20% of Communication Services · score 64.8 · rank 2/24

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · $86.5M; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 0.6x debt load; FCF margin 18% · sector median 0.8x

Verdict: BUYNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	$78.4M
On-site fuel combustion	$8.0M
Vehicle fleets	$0
Process emissions	$0
Fugitive emissions	$0

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 0.6x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: FCF margin and leverage vs sector target.

Communication Services peers

Key takeaways

META's cleanup cost is 0.00 yrs, below the Communication Services median of 0.00 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…