MGM Resorts

MGM · Consumer Discretionary

Sustainability score

47.8Rank 335 overall / 37 in Consumer Discretionary

MGM Resorts's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

33th percentile of the index, 22th percentile of Consumer Discretionary

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

18%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

35%

Net margin

FCF margin

25%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

MGM · MGM Resorts

Middle · middle 60% of Consumer Discretionary · score 47.6 · rank 28/47

Cleanup cost: 0.01 yrs · $14.8M; Sector median 0.01 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 1.8x debt load; FCF margin 8% · sector median 1.6x

Verdict: HOLDNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	$1.6M
On-site fuel combustion	$13.2M
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	$0
Fugitive emissions	$0

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.01 years of earnings (sector median 0.01 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 1.8x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and FCF margin.

Consumer Discretionary peers

Key takeaways

MGM's cleanup cost is 0.01 yrs, above the Consumer Discretionary median of 0.01 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…