Marathon Petroleum

MPC · Energy

Sustainability score

50.7Rank 277 overall / 4 in Energy

Marathon Petroleum's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Emissions intensity and ESG risk score. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

45th percentile of the index, 85th percentile of Energy

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

35%

ESG risk score

29%

Controversy level

10%

Asset turnover

Net margin

FCF margin

18%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

MPC · Marathon Petroleum

Leader · top 20% of Energy · score 46.9 · rank 2/21

Cleanup cost: 0.22 yrs · $3.8bn; Sector median 0.04 yrs
Revenue at risk: 98%; Sector median 100%
Revenue upside: 2%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 1.4x debt load; FCF margin 8% · sector median 0.8x

Verdict: BUYNo position to stressData: reportedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	$134.0M
On-site fuel combustion	$2.4bn
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	$1.2bn
Fugitive emissions	$7.1M

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.22 years of earnings (sector median 0.04 years), fossil revenue 98%, beneficiary revenue 2%, net debt/EBITDA 1.4x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and fossil revenue share.

Marathon Petroleum

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

MPC · Marathon Petroleum

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Energy peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Marathon Petroleum

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

MPC · Marathon Petroleum

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Energy peers

Key takeaways

Explanation