Marsh McLennan

MRSH · Financials

Sustainability score

54.4Rank 174 overall / 37 in Financials

Marsh McLennan's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Emissions intensity.

66th percentile of the index, 52th percentile of Financials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

19%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

43%

Net margin

FCF margin

19%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

MRSH · Marsh McLennan

Middle · middle 60% of Financials · score 47.2 · rank 52/76

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 2.6x debt load; FCF margin 17% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 2.6x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and FCF margin.

Marsh McLennan

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

MRSH · Marsh McLennan

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Marsh McLennan

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

MRSH · Marsh McLennan

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation