M&T Bank

MTB · Financials

Sustainability score

57.7Rank 94 overall / 21 in Financials

M&T Bank's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and ESG risk score. It sits closest to the frontier on FCF margin.

81th percentile of the index, 73th percentile of Financials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

26%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

63%

Net margin

FCF margin

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

MTB · M&T Bank

Leader · top 20% of Financials · score 51.0 · rank 10/76

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: n/a debt load; FCF margin 37% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: BUYNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA n/a; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and FCF margin.

M&T Bank

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

MTB · M&T Bank

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

M&T Bank

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

MTB · M&T Bank

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation