Royal Caribbean Group

RCL · Consumer Discretionary

Sustainability score

34.4Rank 467 overall / 47 in Consumer Discretionary

Royal Caribbean Group's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by FCF margin and Emissions intensity. It sits closest to the frontier on Net margin.

7th percentile of the index, 0th percentile of Consumer Discretionary

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

23%

ESG risk score

Controversy level

Asset turnover

22%

Net margin

FCF margin

35%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

RCL · Royal Caribbean Group

Laggard · bottom 20% of Consumer Discretionary · score 38.1 · rank 42/47

Cleanup cost: 0.07 yrs · $528.7M; Sector median 0.01 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 3.0x debt load; FCF margin -2% · sector median 1.6x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	$212.2k
On-site fuel combustion	$528.5M
Vehicle fleets	$0
Process emissions	$0
Fugitive emissions	$0

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.07 years of earnings (sector median 0.01 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 3.0x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and FCF margin.

Consumer Discretionary peers

Key takeaways

RCL's cleanup cost is 0.07 yrs, above the Consumer Discretionary median of 0.01 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…