Regions Financial Corporation

RF · Financials

Sustainability score

54.0Rank 183 overall / 40 in Financials

Regions Financial Corporation's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Emissions intensity.

64th percentile of the index, 48th percentile of Financials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

10%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

58%

Net margin

FCF margin

18%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

RF · Regions Financial Corporation

Middle · middle 60% of Financials · score 50.0 · rank 22/76

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: n/a debt load; FCF margin 23% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: BUYNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA n/a; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and FCF margin.

Regions Financial Corporation

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

RF · Regions Financial Corporation

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Regions Financial Corporation

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

RF · Regions Financial Corporation

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation