Raymond James Financial

RJF · Financials

Sustainability score

46.0Rank 374 overall / 69 in Financials

Raymond James Financial's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Emissions intensity.

26th percentile of the index, 9th percentile of Financials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

17%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

37%

Net margin

FCF margin

34%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

RJF · Raymond James Financial

Middle · middle 60% of Financials · score 49.0 · rank 41/76

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: n/a debt load; FCF margin 10% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: HOLDNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA n/a; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and FCF margin.

Raymond James Financial

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

RJF · Raymond James Financial

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Raymond James Financial

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

RJF · Raymond James Financial

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation