Ross Stores

ROST · Consumer Discretionary

Sustainability score

59.2Rank 65 overall / 9 in Consumer Discretionary

Ross Stores's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by FCF margin and ESG risk score. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

87th percentile of the index, 83th percentile of Consumer Discretionary

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

12%

ESG risk score

17%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

13%

Net margin

11%

FCF margin

40%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

ROST · Ross Stores

Middle · middle 60% of Consumer Discretionary · score 48.9 · rank 16/47

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · $8.3M; Sector median 0.01 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 0.1x debt load; FCF margin 11% · sector median 1.6x

Verdict: BUYNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	$4.7M
On-site fuel combustion	$3.6M
Vehicle fleets	$0
Process emissions	$0
Fugitive emissions	$0

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.01 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 0.1x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and FCF margin.

Consumer Discretionary peers

Key takeaways

ROST's cleanup cost is 0.00 yrs, below the Consumer Discretionary median of 0.01 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…