Starbucks

SBUX · Consumer Discretionary

Sustainability score

51.1Rank 266 overall / 33 in Consumer Discretionary

Starbucks's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by FCF margin and ESG risk score. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

47th percentile of the index, 30th percentile of Consumer Discretionary

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

18%

ESG risk score

22%

Controversy level

11%

Asset turnover

15%

Net margin

FCF margin

24%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

SBUX · Starbucks

Middle · middle 60% of Consumer Discretionary · score 47.4 · rank 31/47

Cleanup cost: 0.01 yrs · $60.4M; Sector median 0.01 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 1.9x debt load; FCF margin 9% · sector median 1.6x

Verdict: HOLDNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	$15.8M
On-site fuel combustion	$44.6M
Vehicle fleets	$0
Process emissions	$0
Fugitive emissions	$0

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.01 years of earnings (sector median 0.01 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 1.9x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and FCF margin.

Consumer Discretionary peers

Key takeaways

SBUX's cleanup cost is 0.01 yrs, above the Consumer Discretionary median of 0.01 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…