Schlumberger

SLB · Energy

Sustainability score

44.9Rank 389 overall / 10 in Energy

Schlumberger's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Emissions intensity and Asset turnover. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

23th percentile of the index, 55th percentile of Energy

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

34%

ESG risk score

11%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

26%

Net margin

FCF margin

20%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

SLB · Schlumberger

Middle · middle 60% of Energy · score 24.6 · rank 14/21

Cleanup cost: 0.04 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.04 yrs
Revenue at risk: 100%; Sector median 100%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 1.5x debt load; FCF margin 13% · sector median 0.8x

Verdict: HOLDNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.04 years of earnings (sector median 0.04 years), fossil revenue 100%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 1.5x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: fossil revenue share and beneficiary revenue share.

Schlumberger

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

SLB · Schlumberger

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Energy peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Schlumberger

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

SLB · Schlumberger

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Energy peers

Key takeaways

Explanation