Constellation Brands

STZ · Consumer Staples

Sustainability score

46.2Rank 363 overall / 19 in Consumer Staples

Constellation Brands's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and Emissions intensity. It sits closest to the frontier on Net margin.

28th percentile of the index, 45th percentile of Consumer Staples

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

20%

ESG risk score

18%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

36%

Net margin

FCF margin

15%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

STZ · Constellation Brands

Leader · top 20% of Consumer Staples · score 69.9 · rank 6/34

Cleanup cost: 0.02 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.02 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 3.2x debt load; FCF margin 20% · sector median 2.2x

Verdict: BUYNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.02 years of earnings (sector median 0.02 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 3.2x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: FCF margin and transition burden.

Constellation Brands

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

STZ · Constellation Brands

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Consumer Staples peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Constellation Brands

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

STZ · Constellation Brands

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Consumer Staples peers

Key takeaways

Explanation