TKO Group Holdings

TKO · Communication Services

Sustainability score

48.4Rank 324 overall / 13 in Communication Services

TKO Group Holdings's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and ESG risk score. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

36th percentile of the index, 48th percentile of Communication Services

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

11%

ESG risk score

19%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

39%

Net margin

10%

FCF margin

14%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

TKO · TKO Group Holdings

Middle · middle 60% of Communication Services · score 47.3 · rank 11/24

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 2.6x debt load; FCF margin 32% · sector median 0.8x

Verdict: HOLDNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 2.6x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and FCF margin.

Communication Services peers

Key takeaways

TKO's cleanup cost is 0.00 yrs, at the Communication Services median of 0.00 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…