Take-Two Interactive

TTWO · Communication Services

Sustainability score

44.0Rank 399 overall / 22 in Communication Services

Take-Two Interactive's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by FCF margin and Asset turnover. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

21th percentile of the index, 9th percentile of Communication Services

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

15%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

22%

Net margin

11%

FCF margin

39%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

TTWO · Take-Two Interactive

Middle · middle 60% of Communication Services · score 49.6 · rank 6/24

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 0.9x debt load; FCF margin 5% · sector median 0.8x

Verdict: BUYNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 0.9x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: FCF margin and transition burden.

Communication Services peers

Key takeaways

TTWO's cleanup cost is 0.00 yrs, at the Communication Services median of 0.00 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…