Universal Health Services

UHS · Health Care

Sustainability score

45.8Rank 377 overall / 45 in Health Care

Universal Health Services's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by ESG risk score and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

25th percentile of the index, 24th percentile of Health Care

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

10%

ESG risk score

30%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

14%

Net margin

FCF margin

27%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

UHS · Universal Health Services

Middle · middle 60% of Health Care · score 66.1 · rank 28/59

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 1.7x debt load; FCF margin 4% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: HOLDNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 1.7x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and FCF margin.

Universal Health Services

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

UHS · Universal Health Services

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Health Care peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Universal Health Services

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

UHS · Universal Health Services

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Health Care peers

Key takeaways

Explanation