Ulta Beauty

ULTA · Consumer Discretionary

Sustainability score

57.7Rank 96 overall / 12 in Consumer Discretionary

Ulta Beauty's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by FCF margin and Emissions intensity. It sits closest to the frontier on Net debt / EBITDA.

81th percentile of the index, 76th percentile of Consumer Discretionary

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

14%

ESG risk score

11%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

Net margin

13%

FCF margin

49%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

ULTA · Ulta Beauty

Middle · middle 60% of Consumer Discretionary · score 47.6 · rank 27/47

Cleanup cost: 0.01 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.01 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 0.1x debt load; FCF margin 9% · sector median 1.6x

Verdict: HOLDNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.01 years of earnings (sector median 0.01 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 0.1x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and FCF margin.

Consumer Discretionary peers

Key takeaways

ULTA's cleanup cost is 0.01 yrs, at the Consumer Discretionary median of 0.01 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…