Vistra Corp.

VST · Utilities

Sustainability score

29.3Rank 477 overall / 6 in Utilities

Vistra Corp.'s distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Emissions intensity and Asset turnover. It sits closest to the frontier on Controversy level.

5th percentile of the index, 83th percentile of Utilities

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

41%

ESG risk score

13%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

20%

Net margin

FCF margin

13%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

VST · Vistra Corp.

Laggard · bottom 20% of Utilities · score 29.3 · rank 31/31

Cleanup cost: 1.58 yrs · $10.4bn; Sector median 0.55 yrs
Revenue at risk: 65%; Sector median 65%
Revenue upside: 16%; Sector median 15%
Can it pay: 3.0x debt load; FCF margin 12% · sector median 5.4x

Verdict: SELLHolds under ±50% costsData: estimatedUnderweight −0.1pp

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	$10.3M
On-site fuel combustion	$10.4bn
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	$0
Fugitive emissions	$0

Why

Underweight: burden 1.58 years of earnings (sector median 0.55 years), fossil revenue 65%, beneficiary revenue 16%, net debt/EBITDA 3.0x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and transition burden.

Vistra Corp.

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

VST · Vistra Corp.

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Utilities peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Vistra Corp.

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

VST · Vistra Corp.

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Utilities peers

Key takeaways

Explanation