Williams Companies

WMB · Energy

Sustainability score

34.3Rank 469 overall / 21 in Energy

Williams Companies's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by FCF margin and Asset turnover. It sits closest to the frontier on Net margin.

7th percentile of the index, 0th percentile of Energy

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

23%

ESG risk score

Controversy level

Asset turnover

27%

Net margin

FCF margin

32%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

WMB · Williams Companies

Laggard · bottom 20% of Energy · score 17.1 · rank 19/21

Cleanup cost: 0.04 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.04 yrs
Revenue at risk: 100%; Sector median 100%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 3.8x debt load; FCF margin -1% · sector median 0.8x

Verdict: SELLNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.04 years of earnings (sector median 0.04 years), fossil revenue 100%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 3.8x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: fossil revenue share and beneficiary revenue share.

Williams Companies

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

WMB · Williams Companies

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Energy peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Williams Companies

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

WMB · Williams Companies

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Energy peers

Key takeaways

Explanation