Willis Towers Watson

WTW · Financials

Sustainability score

53.2Rank 205 overall / 46 in Financials

Willis Towers Watson's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Emissions intensity.

59th percentile of the index, 40th percentile of Financials

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

ESG risk score

12%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

47%

Net margin

10%

FCF margin

20%

Net debt / EBITDA

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

WTW · Willis Towers Watson

Middle · middle 60% of Financials · score 48.5 · rank 46/76

Cleanup cost: 0.00 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.00 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 1.8x debt load; FCF margin 17% · sector median 2.1x

Verdict: HOLDNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.00 years of earnings (sector median 0.00 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 1.8x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: transition burden and FCF margin.

Willis Towers Watson

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

WTW · Willis Towers Watson

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation

Willis Towers Watson

Sustainability score

Net-zero scenario

WTW · Willis Towers Watson

Cleanup bill by source

Why

Financials peers

Key takeaways

Explanation