Yum! Brands

YUM · Consumer Discretionary

Sustainability score

54.1Rank 182 overall / 25 in Consumer Discretionary

Yum! Brands's distance from the ideal is driven mostly by Asset turnover and FCF margin. It sits closest to the frontier on Net margin.

64th percentile of the index, 48th percentile of Consumer Discretionary

Environmental

Social

Financial/Operational

Distance-to-ideal decomposition

Emissions intensity

13%

ESG risk score

17%

Controversy level

Asset turnover

27%

Net margin

FCF margin

22%

Net debt / EBITDA

14%

Pillar weight shares: Environmental 24%, Social 23%, Financial/Operational 53%

Generating AI analysis...

Net-zero scenario

YUM · Yum! Brands

Middle · middle 60% of Consumer Discretionary · score 50.2 · rank 11/47

Cleanup cost: 0.01 yrs · n/a; Sector median 0.01 yrs
Revenue at risk: 0%; Sector median 0%
Revenue upside: 0%; Sector median 0%
Can it pay: 3.9x debt load; FCF margin 19% · sector median 1.6x

Verdict: BUYNo position to stressData: estimatedHeld at benchmark

Cleanup bill by source

Purchased electricity	n/a
On-site fuel combustion	n/a
Vehicle fleets	n/a
Process emissions	n/a
Fugitive emissions	n/a

Why

Benchmark: burden 0.01 years of earnings (sector median 0.01 years), fossil revenue 0%, beneficiary revenue 0%, net debt/EBITDA 3.9x; largest gaps to the sector ideal: beneficiary revenue share and FCF margin.

Consumer Discretionary peers

Key takeaways

YUM's cleanup cost is 0.01 yrs, at the Consumer Discretionary median of 0.01 yrs.
Fossil revenue at risk is 0% versus a sector median of 0%.
Fund stance: Held at benchmark.

Explanation

Loading company…